Deterministic price levels
Scenario levels come from market data and fixed calculations. A language model may explain computed evidence, but it is not permitted to invent a target, stop, support or resistance value.
Trading.Red connects price structure, momentum, volatility, participation and market regime in one educational workspace. Every scenario is designed to show what was observed, what would confirm the interpretation and what would invalidate it.
No trade execution. No personalized recommendations. Model scores describe rule-based evidence; they are not guaranteed win probabilities.
The interface is only the final layer. The important work is deciding which data belongs to each horizon, which rules can be reproduced and which uncertainties must remain visible.
Scenario levels come from market data and fixed calculations. A language model may explain computed evidence, but it is not permitted to invent a target, stop, support or resistance value.
Short-term analysis uses intraday momentum. Medium-term analysis focuses on multi-session structure. Long-term analysis uses daily and weekly trend context. Disagreement between them is information, not an error to hide.
The latest open candle can still change. Confirmed events require completed data, while developing events are labelled separately to reduce look-ahead bias and unstable historical labels.
A model score summarizes the available feature evidence. It is kept separate from historical validation, scenario ratio and realized outcome so one attractive percentage cannot imply certainty.
These original guides explain both the intended interpretation and the failure modes. They are available without an account.
Learn how connected swing highs and lows describe trend, transition and invalidation—and why confirmation matters more than prediction.
Read the guide →Why support and resistance are areas rather than promises, and how deterministic pivot formulas differ from AI-generated levels.
Read the guide →Learn which evidence separates a developing breakout from a confirmed event and why failed moves deserve their own label.
Read the guide →Use indicators as independent evidence instead of counting several versions of the same price movement as separate confirmation.
Read the guide →A framework for separating horizons, calculating reward relative to risk and avoiding false precision.
Read the guide →Learn what volume and ATR can confirm, what they cannot predict, and why comparisons must use compatible sessions and timeframes.
Read the guide →Understand why a valid overnight price may still be a poor execution reference and how session-aware charts avoid distorted candles.
Read the guide →Why a model should change its expectations when the market changes character—and why neutral is sometimes the most useful output.
Read the guide →A chart is only as reliable as its inputs. Learn the checks that prevent one bad candle or split from corrupting every downstream level.
Read the guide →Understand why a model score is not automatically a probability and how saved publications make performance claims testable.
Read the guide →Data timing: every dashboard identifies the provider snapshot and warns when values may be delayed.
Scenario history: published scenarios are saved so later outcomes are not silently rewritten.
Model boundaries: the methodology explains inputs, score meaning, unavailable states and known limitations.
Trading.Red is educational analytical software, not a broker, investment adviser, fiduciary or execution venue. It does not know a visitor's finances, objectives, tax situation, portfolio concentration or ability to bear loss. Nothing on the site is a personalized instruction to buy, sell, hold or short an instrument. Market data, derived levels and automated classifications may be delayed, incomplete or wrong.
Before making a financial decision, independently verify the underlying data, understand order-execution risk and consider advice from a properly licensed professional who can assess your individual circumstances.